3 ms·
The article mentions USB attacks/exploits...but even more dangerous would be child pornography,at least in the US such a crime does not require intent (as autom
by will_brown 12y ago
The article mentions USB attacks/exploits...but even more dangerous would be child pornography,at least in the US such a crime does not require intent (as automatic as it gets in a criminal context) simply being in possession or even constructive possession would lead to a conviction and a lifetime registration on the sexual offender list.
- speakeron 12y ago>The article mentions USB attacks/exploits I'm not sure that it does. The countermeasures mentioned are for protecting against good old file-based executable exploits. I don't think they even understand the concept of firmware exploits.