3 ms·
Hey, that sounds like a good idea all round! It will also let experienced programmers know that they shouldn't bother applying to your shop (where their experie
by GiraffeNecktie 17y ago
Hey, that sounds like a good idea all round! It will also let experienced programmers know that they shouldn't bother applying to your shop (where their experience is not going to be recognized and valued).
- gruseom 17y agoThey'd be right about that. Experience in and of itself counts for nothing. There are a great many programmers who have years of experience programming badly. Nor have I ever met a great programmer who cared a fig about how many years of experience they or anyone else had. What counts is the value you can add now.
- GiraffeNecktie 17y agoGood luck figuring out from a programming test whether someone is actually going to add value (rather than just be good at solving tests). Experience delivering quality work on time is a reasonable predictor of future success.
- slpsys 17y agoWrong. It can easily be an indicator of a company (or series of companies) that doesn't want to go through the hassle of firing you.
- GiraffeNecktie 17y agoI wrote "Experience delivering quality work on time" I didn't write "has a resume that only proves he showed for work for x number of years".
- throw_away 17y agoThose two look mostly the same on paper. I've looked at the linked-in profiles for people that I've worked with before. There are ones who absolutely sucked and were a net negative for the team, but who "helped deliver feature X" or "drove completion of project Y", but in fact, they probably actually delayed or at least lowered the quality bar of those very things they tout.