4 ms·
I didn't actually know that the site in question was run by this fellow, but I fail to see how it matters in the context of the linked article? Especially in a
by etherael 17y ago
I didn't actually know that the site in question was run by this fellow, but I fail to see how it matters in the context of the linked article? Especially in a "someone is looking over my shoulder and saw me reading about world war I military history" fashion being comparable to "saw me looking at sexual imagery". I don't believe it's appropriate at all.
- ugh 17y agoI have nothing whatsoever against the content of the linked excerpt (in fact I quite distinctly remember reading it somewhere else and liking it a lot). And I also quite enjoyed the discussion here. I just don't think it is so great if you link to content hosted by nutjobs. The article is SFW, so using NSFW was maybe misleading.
- etherael 17y agoFor the record, I found it hitting random on wikipedia and chasing citations. I didn't know a thing about the guy and as soon as I saw highly charged political imagery my mind must have flat blocked it out because I didn't even actually notice it consciously till I checked back just now.
- ugh 17y agoI believe you! I believe you! I didn't for a second think that you had any other intentions other than linking to a interesting article.
- Luc 17y agoPeople jump to conclusions all the time. That graphic at the top of the page is quite evocative, for example. Besides, I'd like to have a respectable source for this article, so I know it hasn't been edited to fit a nutcase agenda.