3 ms·
Not wrong, because the case you linked does not conclude that what constitutes a threat (even in this legal sense) is what the recipient of the message believes
by SamReidHughes 12y ago
Not wrong, because the case you linked does not conclude that what constitutes a threat (even in this legal sense) is what the recipient of the message believes.
- chris_wot 12y agoIt did conclude that it was a threat, and amongst the finer points of the case was that Elonis argued that the test should have been whether he intended the threats or not. The jury decided that a reasonable person would have perceived the accused comments were threatening. Even a reading of a cursory summary of this case would have told you this. Did you actually read the outcome?
- SamReidHughes 12y agoWhat. How does your reply have any logical connection to what I wrote?
- chris_wot 12y agoI just showed you a case where a threat constituted the conclusions the recipient jumped to. Do try to keep up.