4 ms·
Your wording suggests there's a universally accepted standard of what exactly constitutes harassment. As noted in comments below, courts tend to disagree. Perso
by kofejnik 12y ago
Your wording suggests there's a universally accepted standard of what exactly constitutes harassment. As noted in comments below, courts tend to disagree. Personally, I believe that one radfem with agenda and no real proof should not be able to ruin careers and lives by twitter.
- Dewie 12y ago> Your wording suggests there's a universally accepted standard of what exactly constitutes harassment. My wording was "considered harassment". How does "considered" imply a universal standard? > Personally, I believe that one radfem with agenda and no real proof should not be able to ruin careers and lives by twitter. And I think you are discrediting her based on her professed beliefs and background. I totally agree that no one should be able to ruin other people's lives based on their word alone. They should be able to show some proof.