3 ms·

I'm not sure that's an effective argument. Politicians occasionally break the speed limit also, but it's not a great argument for increasing the speed limit.

• ugh 17y ago
  You don't go to jail for breaking the speed limit. And breaking the speed limit has quite a bit more potential of actually hurting other people.
  • axod 17y ago
    Not particularly. Driving at 80mph on motorways, where the limit is 70, is not dangerous. Motorways are the safest roads about. Majority of deaths happen on the quieter windier roads near peoples houses. There's a pretty clear evidence based case for raising the limit to 80, since everyone drives at it anyway, but doing so could be unpopular. So it's reasonably similar.
    • ugh 17y ago
      I'm from Germany. Our motorway has no limits :) (Incidentally the refernce speed for German motorways is 130 km/h or pretty much 80 mph. Driving faster or slower is no misdemeanor or felony, but may increase liability.)
  • lallysingh 17y ago
    You also don't lose your student loans
• dtf 17y ago
  I understand your point, although I would say that the speed limit is rather more directly related to harm to others. My view is that young people will refuse to be lectured on the dangers of drugs by politicians who themselves enjoyed drugs during their youth. Unless that politician's got some kind of personal horror story, such as "heroin killed my entire family", then their opinion will not carry much weight. Kids look at them, see a bunch of basically privileged people that had a wild time and enjoyed all sorts of illegal drugs at college, and then packed it all in when they finally got a good job. This is not a great platform to preach from. Young people ask, "if they can do it, why can't I?"