4 ms·

What you say about Unicode and ASCII sounds correct. But many of those characters are not actually ASCII. See this table[0]; none of "ÿª§ò" are on it [0] htt

What you say about Unicode and ASCII sounds correct. But many of those characters are not actually ASCII. See this table[0]; none of "ÿª§ò" are on it [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII

DanBC 12y ago
I was going to say that you've pointed to the 7 bit ASCII chart and you want the 8 bit Extended ASCII chart. But the wikipage chart for extended ascii doesn't have those characters either so maybe it's extended ASCII and codepages? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_ASCII https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_ASCII Weirdly, because neither chart has the smiley face characters I don't find them trustworthy charts. I am obviously wrong!
- Sharlin 12y ago
  As the Wikipedia article states, there is no single thing called "the" extended ASCII. It is a nonstandard term that can refer to any of the multitude of 8-bit encodings that contain ASCII as a subset.
  - TazeTSchnitzel 12y ago
    Heck, even UTF-8 could be considered "extended ASCII".

What you say about Unicode and ASCII sounds correct. But many of those characters are not actually ASCII. See this table[0]; none of "ÿª§ò" are on it [0] htt

What you say about Unicode and ASCII sounds correct. But many of those characters are not actually ASCII. See this table[0]; none of "ÿª§ò" are on it [0] htt

What you say about Unicode and ASCII sounds correct. But many of those characters are not actually ASCII. See this table[0]; none of "ÿª§ò" are on it [0] htt

What you say about Unicode and ASCII sounds correct. But many of those characters are not actually ASCII. See this table[0]; none of "ÿª§ò" are on it [0] htt