Programs aren't measured solely by absolute success rate. They are also measured by success rate relative to alternative approaches to the same problem that cou

Programs aren't measured solely by absolute success rate. They are also measured by success rate relative to alternative approaches to the same problem that could be enabled by the same resources. Which is to say "35% > 0%" sounds good, but would wilt in the presence of "35% < 45%". Might I suggest a different set of evaluation criteria?