4 ms·
No, 900$ per ounce still... But it would take up a larger volume so you'd need less mass per watch.
by acveilleux 12y ago
No, 900$ per ounce still... But it would take up a larger volume so you'd need less mass per watch.
- beggi 12y agoRight sorry, I was reading it as $900 for gold per watch not per ounce!