Do you have any reason to disbelieve the woman? Does she have a history of telling lies? It seems awfully dismissive to call it "hearsay evidence". Also, it

Do you have any reason to disbelieve the woman? Does she have a history of telling lies? It seems awfully dismissive to call it "hearsay evidence". Also, it doesn't look like the law is involved, so I don't think any conviction is taking place. My take on it: yet another creepy dude in power in a tech company. There's still a little of the "circle the wagons" attitude, but thankfully a lot less than I was expecting.