I think some of those "Go lacks feature X" are the arguments you're eager to hear, and not simply invalid. Go lacking generics but having generic map/array typ

I think some of those "Go lacks feature X" are the arguments you're eager to hear, and not simply invalid. Go lacking generics but having generic map/array types built in is an example of going against the Scheme school of thought. They're not built up from primitive features, but handed down as language features. I think this post makes those criticisms well: https://www.quora.com/Do-you-feel-that-golang-is-ugly/answer/Tikhon-Jelvis?srid=hMkC&share=1 https://www.quora.com/Do-you-feel-that-golang-is-ugly/answer...