2 ms·
9-0 unanimous that the police must have a warrant prior to using a GPS vehicle tracker. The reasonings differ among the justices but the vote was unanimous. ht
by vermontdevil 12y ago
9-0 unanimous that the police must have a warrant prior to using a GPS vehicle tracker. The reasonings differ among the justices but the vote was unanimous.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Jones_%282012%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Jones_%282012%...
- spiritplumber 12y agoFaith in humanity for today restored!
- _delirium 12y agoThe split in reasons did lead to the fundamental question being sort of dodged. The majority opinion decided the case on quite narrow grounds: that the physical installation of the GPS device violated the 4th amendment, because installing it involved tampering with someone's personal property (the car) without a warrant. Four justices would have gone further and argued it would require a warrant to operate such a GPS tracker regardless of how it was installed, but the majority left that question unanswered.