3 ms·
Then the document they sold should have had the relevant commercial license text included. If the document still contained the CC text then they can't really us
by TehCorwiz 12y ago
Then the document they sold should have had the relevant commercial license text included. If the document still contained the CC text then they can't really use that defense can they?
- icebraining 12y agoYes, they can. They don't need to include their license with the work. When you buy a DVD, you don't get a copy of the licensing terms between the authors and the record company, either. Just because the CC license was included, that doesn't mean Elsevier is distributing the work under it. And in fact, there's a simple explanation: it's a license for the reader.
- TehCorwiz 12y agoGood point. That explanation would put the article's premise on shaky ground.
- jsprogrammer 12y agoHow can one verify that a vendor has been licensed to sell a work if they don't include their license with the author? Maybe a street vendor has been licensed to sell the just-appeared-in-theater movie that they are selling? It seems someone who acquires a work has no responsibility (or most of the time, ability) to verify a proper license.
- dragonwriter 12y ago> How can one verify that a vendor has been licensed to sell a work if they don't include their license with the author? One generally is not expected to, unless one is the author or author's representative, in which case one doesn't need the vendor to provide the license agreement. > Maybe a street vendor has been licensed to sell the just-appeared-in-theater movie that they are selling? A more valid analogy here would be "maybe the multiplex cinema selling movie tickets has been licensed to screen the just-appeared-in-theater movie that they are showing".