3 ms·
I don't think the "social safety net" was intended to keep wealthy people wealthy. It's to ensure basic needs are met. If you want to remain wealthy, you shou
by mod 12y ago
I don't think the "social safety net" was intended to keep wealthy people wealthy.
It's to ensure basic needs are met.
If you want to remain wealthy, you should probably not count on unemployment to play a role in that.
- angersock 12y agoI think your definition of wealthy needs some serious, serious readjustment.
- Yakimoto 12y agoMaybe you should consider adjusting your understanding of poor too.
- showsover 12y agoAnd in Belgium, you are wrong about that. If you take home 1500€ net each month, and lose your job, social security first gives you around the same 1450 - 1500. After a few months (I think 3 or so) it goes down to 1300 or so, until you get a maximum of X where X is around the minimum living wage. This is to ensure that people don't have to sell or move immediately after being fired. Which makes sense.
- markcampbell 12y agoThis example is flawed. What is the max take home pay of someone on unemployment benefits in Belgium? In Canada under EI (employment insurance) it's about $500 per week (~$2000 CAD per month).