3 ms·
As someone who has been using Storm, this looks very interesting. What I particularly like are the clean, well thought-out ideas. Also, easily reconfigurable (a
by jwr 12y ago
As someone who has been using Storm, this looks very interesting. What I particularly like are the clean, well thought-out ideas. Also, easily reconfigurable (at runtime) topologies are something we'd be interested in. I will definitely take a very close look at Onyx.
Performance is important: in our case, decreasing it significantly below Storm's level would not be acceptable.
Also, I watched the Strange Loop presentation and the tree model looks limiting to me: I have topologies where I need to merge information from two streams (but perhaps I haven't understood the Onyx model yet).
- XPherior 12y agoPerformance - wait until the 0.6.0 release. We'll be caught up with Storm by then. The tree model is being removed in 0.6.0 in favor of a vector of vectors (DAG), which allows multiple inputs. See https://github.com/MichaelDrogalis/onyx/blob/0.5.x/doc/user-guide/concepts.md#workflow https://github.com/MichaelDrogalis/onyx/blob/0.5.x/doc/user-... The tree model wasn't one of my better ideas. Edit: to be clear, you can do stream joins right now in 0.5.3 with the DAG model.