3 ms·
One difference with Squall is that, while the post is an image on Twitter, it lives on as a text post on Squall.io. So you can always follow the link and parse
by barisser 12y ago
One difference with Squall is that, while the post is an image on Twitter, it lives on as a text post on Squall.io. So you can always follow the link and parse the text there.
Also the images are highly legible. Check out this Squall for example: https://twitter.com/bshyong/status/573557768285732864 https://twitter.com/bshyong/status/573557768285732864
- nicwest 12y agoaren't you going to have issues like this in the twitter stream, where the top and bottom of the image is lost: http://i.imgur.com/6jfKcFW.png http://i.imgur.com/6jfKcFW.png
- ianhernandez 12y agojust one more click, and you'll have the entire post in your stream, no redirecting, no extraneous page loads. ( •_•) ( •_•)>⌐■-■ (⌐■_■)
- danneu 12y agoYou see the title and a legible paragraph when you're scrolling through a feed of random tweets. Seems superior to any alternative I can think of.