3 ms·

I'm afraid I have to agree. gov.uk has been a reversion to the mean. It's not nearly as good as direct.gov that preceded it. On the other hand it replaces many

I'm afraid I have to agree. gov.uk has been a reversion to the mean. It's not nearly as good as direct.gov that preceded it. On the other hand it replaces many cruddy government websites that had impossible navigation. So it replaces variance with consistent mediocrity: the McDonalds of websites.

alextgordon 12y ago
To those downvoting, let me illustrate: This was the old directgov site: https://i.imgur.com/s7lHXGD.png https://i.imgur.com/s7lHXGD.png This is the new gov.uk site: https://i.imgur.com/IgyTCLL.png https://i.imgur.com/IgyTCLL.png Which do you think does a better job of presenting the information?