Here comes the full text of an old research comparing traditional interviewing with other methods: https://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/psicologia/pei/diferencias/Hu

Here comes the full text of an old research comparing traditional interviewing with other methods: https://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/psicologia/pei/diferencias/Hunter1984JobPerformance.pdf https://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/psicologia/pei/diferencias/H... (tl;dr traditional interviwing has validity .14) Here's the more recent, often cited meta-analysis: http://mavweb.mnsu.edu/howard/Schmidt%20and%20Hunter%201998%20Validity%20and%20Utility%20Psychological%20Bulletin.pdf http://mavweb.mnsu.edu/howard/Schmidt%20and%20Hunter%201998%... (tl;dr structured interview has validity of .51) Naturally it has an extensive bibliography if you'd like to dive deeper in the topic. And even more references can be found here: http://www.people.vcu.edu/~mamcdani/Publications/McDaniel%20et%20al%201994%20JAP%20Validity%20of%20interviews.pdf http://www.people.vcu.edu/~mamcdani/Publications/McDaniel%20...