4 ms·
mode would more likely be 1. King Soloman might have had 600 partners, but he had many many more soldiers (who probably could have managed the 1 wife)
by whatusername 17y ago
mode would more likely be 1. King Soloman might have had 600 partners, but he had many many more soldiers (who probably could have managed the 1 wife)
- nostrademons 17y agoHow many slaves were there that had no wives? If the mean across all males (not just those who reproduce) is one wife, as expected by a 50/50 sex distribution, then that means King Solomon's 600 partners meant that 599 men have no wives. Dunno how that would compare with the number that had 1 wife, but I wouldn't be surprised if the former is greater.