I wasn't trying to be. I wasn't saying "yeah, but 'entire point' strictly means... fnar fnar". I was responding to a point above that seemed to imply that code

I wasn't trying to be. I wasn't saying "yeah, but 'entire point' strictly means... fnar fnar". I was responding to a point above that seemed to imply that code like this can't be considered great (or at least, no greater than a Rails website), because its not what computers are for. They are for calculating things humans can't. I disagree with that. And not on a pedantic, language level. It is a genuine confusion, i think, between why something was made and what it can do. Though on re-reading, I may have misinterpreted the OP.