4 ms·
The typescript move is more along the lines of "we had these extensions to typescript we were calling AtScript, but now they're included in the forthcoming rele
by pfooti 12y ago
The typescript move is more along the lines of "we had these extensions to typescript we were calling AtScript, but now they're included in the forthcoming release of TypeScript, so we'll just call it Typescript". It doesn't seem to actually change any on-the-ground syntax, just what you call the language.
another, more important piece (IMO) of response to the pushback they've been getting came during the new router demo at ng-conf today. Apparently, you'll be able to mix-and-match ng2 and ng1 routes within the same router, so the commitment was: if you use the new router, there's a clear incremental upgrade path as you port parts of your app to ng2.
I'm still in wait-and-see mode, but there's apparently also talk (from the same router talk) of tools to convert ui-router built routers to the new router, which would be double-rad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vecg70fPDFw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vecg70fPDFw (the router talk in question)
- Alex3917 12y ago> just what you call the language. Being part of an existing project that's backed by both MS and Google is a significant value proposition though. I wouldn't have learned AtScript, although I'll probably end up learning Typescript now even though they're the exact same thing.