3 ms·
He meant the "movie budget" could be arbitrary chosen to satisfy the "feat under huge constraints". Right, which is exactly why that isn't a good analogy to so
by sago 12y ago
He meant the "movie budget" could be arbitrary chosen to satisfy the "feat under huge constraints".
Right, which is exactly why that isn't a good analogy to something where the budget was fixed, and the 'greatness' isn't an aesthetic judgement, but whether it can be done.