3 ms·
You can play it, but to compete well you need to spend money. Pay to win, like any other game. So no, it's not good. It's based on wallet size, not skill.
by ChrisClark 12y ago
You can play it, but to compete well you need to spend money. Pay to win, like any other game. So no, it's not good. It's based on wallet size, not skill.
- Rmilb 12y agoIs there any competitive simulation game for mobile that is not pay to win? I'm looking for something along the lines of League of Legends business model.
- ChuckMcM 12y agoFor me the question is are there any games where you can trade time for money. Which is to say you can be just as good/powerful/equipped as any other player who spent $x by putting in y minutes of play time. And then what is the factor 'k' such that $1 = k? Basically what level does skill play in your cost of levelling.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- jgh 12y agoVainglory Hearthstone is also a good one if you're more into CCGs. Prime World Defenders has gotten me lately too, though that's just a single-player game.
- jbattle 12y agoit's a little older and more for tablets than phones, but Frozen Synapse is well regarded
- freshyill 12y agoIt's just the new way of things: The game is free, but the fun costs extra.
- joshuapants 12y agoThat's the best way I've heard it worded. Makes it more obvious than "pay to win."