4 ms·
Hard to say. It didn't seem like Microsoft had a good strategy for modern web development (javascript/rest/etc.) at least from the client side. They had webform
by logicalmind 12y ago
Hard to say. It didn't seem like Microsoft had a good strategy for modern web development (javascript/rest/etc.) at least from the client side. They had webforms/MVC but you pretty much had to use client side controls from other sources, like Telerik, if you wanted to do something modern. One assumes that tooling with javascript would be difficult for them to add in Visual Studio, say as compared to the tooling offered for C#. So moving to a typed language allows them to have nice Visual Studio tooling as well as picking a path for modern web development.