4 ms·
It would also be nice if you could disable spam filtering entirely and run your own client-side.
by shiggerino 12y ago
It would also be nice if you could disable spam filtering entirely and run your own client-side.
- TeMPOraL 12y agoLooking at the contents of my spam folder, and knowing that they likely reject many more e-mails in the background, I'm pretty sure I'd drown if I ever tried to use such option...
- clogston 12y ago> It would also be nice if you could disable spam filtering entirely and run your own client-side. It's horribly convoluted but it /is/ possible to do so: http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/69442/how-to-disable-gmail-anti-spam-completely http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/69442/how-to-disa... I've been running it this way for about 18 months now after having a few important emails get gobbled up by their spam filter.
- shiggerino 12y agoIt's as if they intentionally want to force their filter on you. Not that there's anything wrong with a server-side spam filter. One that puts a polite X-Spam-Score header so you can adjust the sensitivity client-side.