3 ms·
Not really.. you provide the base code, and the consumer of your package generates the specific types they need. As the package author, you don't actually gene
by NateDad 12y ago
Not really.. you provide the base code, and the consumer of your package generates the specific types they need. As the package author, you don't actually generate any of the concrete implementations.
- danieldk 12y agoWhich defies the whole point of easy go-gettable packages. gen is a good contribution, but it only works for a subset of cases. E.g. I follow a comparable approach in my Java library for finite state dictionaries because Java does not provide generics over primitive types (luckily, that is a closed class). But it's less than ideal.