3 ms·
For a more accurate comparison to amazon multiply by at least 3 for redundancy, don't forget to factor in the cost of the real estate, replacement equipment, em
by jacobsenscott 12y ago
For a more accurate comparison to amazon multiply by at least 3 for redundancy, don't forget to factor in the cost of the real estate, replacement equipment, employees to run it all, etc. You would be hard pressed to beat amazon prices, which are falling over time.
- lunixbochs 12y agoYou're absolutely right. I was aiming for a baseline/ballpark here. At this scale, redundancy via 3x mirror is pretty expensive. You could likely get away with something like chunks of 12 drives in raidz3, especially if you're planning on having at least a few facilities like this. $1m setup + land + a few salaries upkeep sounds like the kind of thing you could convince a few governments to do. However, Glacier won't do at all for the live Internet Archive, so it's a question of whether they want this to have live replication or not (if the whole backup is offline, who does your integrity checks?) I'm actually curious how much it would money/storage space it would require to print the entire Internet Archive on whatever the current equivalent of microfiche is (anything cheap and more permanent than magnetic or optical storage).