5 ms·

I disagree with the characterization of people who think he could have used his means more effectively than this as "ungrateful, entitled assholes." Are we req

• TeMPOraL 12y ago
  > I disagree with the characterization of people who think he could have used his means more effectively than this as "ungrateful, entitled assholes." Not everyone is, of course, but I imagine this is how it feels to be on the receiving end of those complaints. > Are we required to celebrate everything a wealthy man does with his money as long as it's not overtly bad? Of course not. But what I see is that the default reaction is almost always whining. I wonder how wealthy people cope with that - whatever they do, they get to read a ton of crap written about them. And particularly, Paul Allen does a lot of really useful stuff with his wealth.
  • Aushin 12y ago
    In this case, I think it's because the general perception is that we're expected to praise him for this (Twitter announcement, press releases) and there is a backlash against that expectation. Also I got downvoted for my first comment. I can't even imagine who took offense or why.
    • TeMPOraL 12y ago
      Me neither. I upvoted you to compensate.
• vinceguidry 12y ago
  No. You're free to ignore it. But please don't join the cavalcade of armchair philanthropists who think they can fix the world if only they could control enough of someone else's money.