3 ms·
What you're describing is known as Applied Kinesiology[1] and is not supported by evidence[2]. The Hawkins scale of consciousness is equally unsupported. [1] h
by muaddirac 12y ago
What you're describing is known as Applied Kinesiology[1] and is not supported by evidence[2]. The Hawkins scale of consciousness is equally unsupported.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applied_kinesiology http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applied_kinesiology
[2] http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Tests/ak.html http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Tests/ak.h...
- vinceguidry 12y agoOf course it isn't. I don't use it anymore. It was hard to keep taking seriously when I was calibrating things in the billions. It felt distinctly like Dragonball Z. The muscle test itself is interesting all on its own without the need to have to explain exactly what it's doing. You don't know what answer any given test is going to return and you can ask follow up questions to try to understand why. The test was coherent for me, up until it wasn't, that event created the tulpa.