The whole point of that Tidbits article was "the WSJ is probably wrong, because the idea that Apple would use 1/3 of the world's gold is an absurdity." Treatin

The whole point of that Tidbits article was "the WSJ is probably wrong, because the idea that Apple would use 1/3 of the world's gold is an absurdity." Treating a reductio as if it were a proof is just deeply silly.