3 ms·
You presuppose there'll always be a GUI. That's similar to the assumption that I don't need reading skills since there'll always be an audio version. True for m
by groby_b 12y ago
You presuppose there'll always be a GUI. That's similar to the assumption that I don't need reading skills since there'll always be an audio version. True for many cases, but the more you approach one-off, the more you'll find there is no audio version. Or no GUI.
The question is, are there examples where the cost of acquiring and applying the skill is worth the savings? In individual instances, doubtful. Done habitually, probably - the case for reading is fairly well established.
The case for computational literacy might be hampered by the very spotty availability of data. Once you can obtain data sets, it definitely becomes worth it.
Silly overprivileged example: When I was looking for a place to live, I was evaluating the location to choose based on a heat map generated from 20+ different metrics. As a result, I found a place that
* Was well below what you usually pay
* Was pretty unique for the area I'm in
* Makes me happy every day
* Only cost me a 15 minute increase in commute time. (This is L.A., so consider that an achievement of epic proportions ;)
Was that one instance worth spending time learning how to work with computers? No. But it's one single neat payoff. And if the data hadn't required custom scrapers, it would've required only minutes of my time.
- Double_Cast 12y agoCorrection: I presuppose there'll always be a GUI for the cases where the average Joe has a show-stopping problem frequent enough to warrant someone else to build a GUI solution. Literacy is needed because (a) people need it on a daily-basis at least and (b) it's a meta-skill since it's impractical for people to learn other subjects without it. Contrast literacy with programming. I don't expect that programming will be as frequent or spontaneous except in a future where either (a) brain emulations exist or (b) citizens interface with reality exclusively through emacs. Nor do I consider programming a meta-skill in the sense that refusing to learn it will impede you from accessing every other area of human knowledge. (But I'm glad you're enjoying L.A.)