2 ms·
I'm more skeptical of the benefit of auto-hyphenation than the author is; it's been my experience that even with a proper hyphenation dictionary, you get some w
by mkozlows 12y ago
I'm more skeptical of the benefit of auto-hyphenation than the author is; it's been my experience that even with a proper hyphenation dictionary, you get some weird hyphenations that you want to manually undo (or force).
Which means that if you're working with print, where you can do those corrections/fixes, hyphenation is great; let the algorithms work, do your little bit of fine-tuning, and it's good. But on the web, you can't do your fine-tuning, so it's auto or nothing -- and "nothing"/unjustified text typically has less annoying failure modes than auto-hyphenated/justified text does.
And I think the author is flat wrong about preferring unstyled content flashes over delayed rendering of content that's waiting for a font. The unstyled flashes are massively distracting and disorienting to a reader; the delayed rendering just makes it seem like the page is a bit slow to finish loading.
- KwanEsq 12y ago> But on the web, you can't do your fine-tuning, so it's auto or nothing -- and "nothing"/unjustified text typically has less annoying failure modes than auto-hyphenated/justified text does. Can fine-tuning not be achieved with the soft-hyphen [0] and the word joiner [1] ? [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Soft_hyphen&oldid=625641896 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Soft_hyphen&oldid... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Word_joiner&oldid=644348648 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Word_joiner&oldid...
- mkozlows 12y agoYou can't see the rendered-on-the-user's-screen result, is the thing, and dynamic layouts mean that it might appear differently in different places.