You are comparing a small theoretical start-up town in the middle of nowhere and with a non-existing economy and job-market - to an already established city th

You are comparing a small theoretical start-up town in the middle of nowhere and with a non-existing economy and job-market - to an already established city that is the business center and capital of a country (a country that itself is the business center of the EU). That seems like an exception being used to disprove someone else's rule. Unless they already have the money to exist and live there, no one is going to move to a place they can't afford. So the question is again - why would they move there, except this time you are asking only people that are not part of the typical job market / economy (because the number of available gainful jobs there is too low; and at the same time no one is looking to start businesses there). It seems like these types of places are for only the upper class, especially considering that low scale gives high prices. Or goes the other way, and makes lots and lots of suicide inducing standard units, small in size, with uniform paint jobs, and all placed together. A place where the government pays your rent.