3 ms·
I'm having a hard time understanding the argument. Let's say I have a site that uses best practices for HTTP/1.1, and loads within 2 seconds without caching.
by omgitstom 12y ago
I'm having a hard time understanding the argument.
Let's say I have a site that uses best practices for HTTP/1.1, and loads within 2 seconds without caching. It sounds like the article saying that switching to HTTP/2 will make my site slower.
What I've read so far in other places is that the site should by default (no modifications) be faster, it is just wont be optimized until I remove all my hacks for HTTP/1.1
- omgitstom 12y agoAs a follow up question, has anyone thought / worked through support both HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 simultaneously?
- Eyas 12y agoRight, the practices are 'harmful' in an HTTP/2 world, meaning, in that world, these practices harm you rather than help you. You are correct in assuming that your site and its resources would still load faster in HTTP/2.
- mordocai 12y agoI am far from an expert but from what I understand a HTTP/2 site with HTTP 1.1 'hacks' for performance will: Run slower than the same site with the HTTP 1.1 'hacks' removed Run faster than the same site serving via HTTP 1.1. In most cases.