5 ms·
If you're going to criticize the book, at least consider the time in which it was written, don't just say "it was bad and tedious and I couldn't get through it"
by bhousel 17y ago
If you're going to criticize the book, at least consider the time in which it was written, don't just say "it was bad and tedious and I couldn't get through it". Atlas Shrugged was written in the 40s and 50s as a response to Communism, which was the new cool philosophy at the time. Objectivism and laissez-faire capitalism certainly have their flaws, and they're the same as for any other philosophical solution-to-everything that starts with, "if only everyone in the world would.."
There are some ideas in there worth reading, and plenty that today seem dated. Anyway, it's healthy to read things that you disagree with..
Thanks for the suggestion of The Name of the Rose, added it to my wish list.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- gaius 17y agoYes exactly. It's a product of its time. Many people consider Asimov or Heinlein equally impenetrable. Hell, many people consider Joyce and Proust tedious. And I wouldn't be at all surprised in a few years if Atlas Shrugged is attacked for glorifying smoking and pollution too...
- cwinters 17y agoPublication date of 1984: 1949. Bad writing is bad writing.