4 ms·

This is a fair consideration. However, having seen "tiny homes" in person, I'm convinced they are very different than a traditional RV or trailer. > There is n

by mbesto 12y ago

This is a fair consideration. However, having seen "tiny homes" in person, I'm convinced they are very different than a traditional RV or trailer. > There is no second, remote property in Nevada, because all the homes adhere to a common standard for utility hookups and foundation pads. Solution: Solar (electricity) and gas propane (for heat). > hotels, time-share condominiums, furnished apartments rented weekly, couch-surfing, pieds-a-terre. None of these are economical because their high price is driven by regularly unused capacity. Also, there are benefits to being "swappable" in that entrepreneurs are always close to other entrepreneurs. YCombinator alone could benefit from such a system where they have 100+ entrepreneurs temporarily relocated to the Mountain View area every 3 months.

logfromblammo 12y ago
I strongly encourage you to live in another city--possibly even one entirely outside of California--for a year. To mix two entirely appropriate metaphors, you are attempting to summon the molehill to Muhammad. Different cities have different problems. As far as I know, "not able to live in close physical proximity to potential investors" is one that is unique to Silicon Valley.
- mbesto 12y ago
  > As far as I know, "not able to live in close physical proximity to potential investors" is one that is unique to Silicon Valley. I think you're conflating two arguments here. I'm not suggesting this is a solution that scales to other cities. I am suggesting however, it would solve them in SV given the current funding climate. > I strongly encourage you to live in another city I've lived (professionally) in Chicago, Philadelphia, New York, London and Germany. I'm not sure what my living experiences outside of SV have to do with the context of the discussion... for more context, the problem that is being identified here is not currently a problem that I have.
  - logfromblammo 12y ago
    Perhaps I need to live in Silicon Valley, then, to gain an understanding of why your idea is not completely batty (or perhaps why the region itself is not as barking mad as it appears to an outsider). While I have no scientific evidence to back this up, you may also have noticed that certain places have their own collective consciousness, where the local social conformity creates standing waves of recurring behavior. People in Chicago go to Portillo's, even though it's pretty much the same food as all the Vienna Beef independents in the city, only with higher prices and longer lines. I can't explain it, other than to say that people go there because people go there. And just like you can't smell the peculiar odor of your own house until you've been away from it for a while, maybe you just don't notice the oddities of a town until you live elsewhere. Your suggestion might work. I think the real reason I don't like it is the idea that someone might invest. The very idea that someone might possibly throw a few million into it makes me angry. It's not your fault. It's just sour grapes.
    - tptacek 12y ago
      You don't go to Portillos for the hot dogs. It's not the best italian beef in the city, but it's not terrible, and it's reliably available, unlike Johnny's. It's like our In-N-Out.

by mbesto 12y ago

logfromblammo 12y ago

I strongly encourage you to live in another city--possibly even one entirely outside of California--for a year. To mix two entirely appropriate metaphors, you are attempting to summon the molehill to Muhammad. Different cities have different problems. As far as I know, "not able to live in close physical proximity to potential investors" is one that is unique to Silicon Valley.

mbesto 12y ago
> As far as I know, "not able to live in close physical proximity to potential investors" is one that is unique to Silicon Valley. I think you're conflating two arguments here. I'm not suggesting this is a solution that scales to other cities. I am suggesting however, it would solve them in SV given the current funding climate. > I strongly encourage you to live in another city I've lived (professionally) in Chicago, Philadelphia, New York, London and Germany. I'm not sure what my living experiences outside of SV have to do with the context of the discussion... for more context, the problem that is being identified here is not currently a problem that I have.
- logfromblammo 12y ago
  Perhaps I need to live in Silicon Valley, then, to gain an understanding of why your idea is not completely batty (or perhaps why the region itself is not as barking mad as it appears to an outsider). While I have no scientific evidence to back this up, you may also have noticed that certain places have their own collective consciousness, where the local social conformity creates standing waves of recurring behavior. People in Chicago go to Portillo's, even though it's pretty much the same food as all the Vienna Beef independents in the city, only with higher prices and longer lines. I can't explain it, other than to say that people go there because people go there. And just like you can't smell the peculiar odor of your own house until you've been away from it for a while, maybe you just don't notice the oddities of a town until you live elsewhere. Your suggestion might work. I think the real reason I don't like it is the idea that someone might invest. The very idea that someone might possibly throw a few million into it makes me angry. It's not your fault. It's just sour grapes.
  - tptacek 12y ago
    You don't go to Portillos for the hot dogs. It's not the best italian beef in the city, but it's not terrible, and it's reliably available, unlike Johnny's. It's like our In-N-Out.