Based on the article, it sounds like they're getting the worst of both worlds - getting it wrong slow. They've been working on it for how many years, and it can

Based on the article, it sounds like they're getting the worst of both worlds - getting it wrong slow. They've been working on it for how many years, and it can't handle seeing a plane at 60k ft without crashing the whole thing? I have some sympathy for the idea that most modern software companies, especially VC-funded startups, tend to prioritize getting to market fast over making everything exactly right. I'm not even saying it's wrong for them and their market. But if we're looking for something that's well-designed and carefully tested before going to market, along with a process designed to produce that, this doesn't sound like it at all.