> Bitcoin has nothing to do with waging war or the end of the state. Cash is just as important in war as bodies to throw into the meat grinder. If the state l

> Bitcoin has nothing to do with waging war or the end of the state. Cash is just as important in war as bodies to throw into the meat grinder. If the state loses its control over the money supply, it isn't going to be able to finance war... or exert much influence otherwise. > As for me being unrealistic: it's my life, I'll be happy... Cool, I thought you were interested in solving a problem outside of yourself - carry on. > Defense contractors can't wage war without people willing to operate the weapons... There will always be people to operate the weapons, offer more money or tell them that their god demands it. > As for the no-fly zones and the UN weapon inspectors: Yeah, I'm not going to argue about facts - first result in google: http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/30/world/meast/iraq-weapons-inspections-fast-facts/ http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/30/world/meast/iraq-weapons-inspe... > It's all just dumb wars over resources no more, no less. Agreed, but the original point was about legal justification, not actual agenda.