4 ms·
Also disappointed about their promised privacy features that never made it: https://plus.google.com/+MaxHuijgen/posts/haKeEyEHR55 https://plus.google.com/+MaxHu
by matkam 12y ago
Also disappointed about their promised privacy features that never made it: https://plus.google.com/+MaxHuijgen/posts/haKeEyEHR55 https://plus.google.com/+MaxHuijgen/posts/haKeEyEHR55
- wtbob 12y agoAnd what's a real shame is that they could still make money off of private users. It's possible to offer targeted ads based on unencrypted metadata and hashed keywords (c.f. some of the interested work GNUnet has done on search); they could also offer 100% private (client-side encrypted) accounts for an upcharge. Google's revenue per user is reputed to be roughly $10 per annum; I'd be willing to pay $50/year for client-side encrypted everything. Yes, it'd cost money to maintain that infrastructure, but I bet there are enough people who'd want to do it, and would be willing to pay enough to do it, that it'd be profitable.
- tdkl 12y agoThey make more from data, then upfront payments.
- wtbob 12y agoThe revenue-per-user number (supposedly) reflects the revenue they're getting from that data. If they're making $X/user from data+payments, and Z users propose paying $XY, where $XYZ is more than sufficient to pay for the infrastructure and yield a tidy profit, why not do it?
- Retric 12y agoGoogle revinue is ~US$ 66.001 billion so they make ~9.54$ per person in the world. However, I suspect actual users is probably closer to 2 billion than 7 billion. ex: ~1.17 billion people use Google search.
- abraham 12y ago> promised privacy features They were never promised. It was internal dev tools that accidentally got released.