I think the premise is flawed, intuitive analytic is not a contradiction in terms. I'd be more prone to ascribe said beliefs to dominance of emotion over thoug

I think the premise is flawed, intuitive analytic is not a contradiction in terms. I'd be more prone to ascribe said beliefs to dominance of emotion over thought. The way they use the language seems to imply they're trying to scale for the Intuitive vs Sensate side of the personality scale rather than the Thinking vs Feeling side. I'd find it a lot harder to believe intuition vs sensory information gathering led to higher superstitious belief, and a lot easier to believe that emotional rather than logical evaluation methods are focused in this direction. Interesting point nonetheless.