3 ms·
It may not be especially problematic, but it is more problematic than if they were grabbing .google. It shows that the gTLD plan wasn't well considered. The mor
by WillPostForFood 12y ago
It may not be especially problematic, but it is more problematic than if they were grabbing .google. It shows that the gTLD plan wasn't well considered. The more generic the TLD, the more there is going to be an expectation that it is open.
- dragonwriter 12y ago> It shows that the gTLD plan wasn't well considered. That ICANN's gTLD rollout, is, from concept to execution, a complete disaster is not a point I'm going to argue against. The question I'm asking is that given that the ICANN gTLD rollout is happening, what is the basis for complaining about the way Google is behaving?