3 ms·
That might be true, but look at .ceo or .luxury you can't buy those domains very cheaply. If google doesn't want you using a .app or any of their gtlds they can
by hayksaakian 12y ago
That might be true, but look at .ceo or .luxury you can't buy those domains very cheaply. If google doesn't want you using a .app or any of their gtlds they can simply make them prohobitivly expensive.
- bhauer 12y agoExactly. And to clarify, I very well may have missed something in the gTLD process that expressly requires—or attempted to require—the leasing of subdomains to the public. Although I was familiar enough with gTLDs to decide I was opposed to their creation, I nevertheless have spent little time actually studying gTLD requirements and processes in detail. But even if there is such a requirement for public leasing, as you said above, the cost and process for subdomain registration could be designed by the owner to be prohibitive. I am not joking when I say it not once occurred to me that owners of gTLDs may be required to lease subdomains. I assumed, in fact, that a great deal of them would be used as the exclusive playgrounds of their well-off owners. As far as I can tell, the linked article/blog entry doesn't actually establish that requirement, but I could be wrong.