Google elsewhere, another time, kind of said that they'll be pushing for HTTPS "all-the-thing". It is their agenda. An agenda I do not juge nefarious, just one

Google elsewhere, another time, kind of said that they'll be pushing for HTTPS "all-the-thing". It is their agenda. An agenda I do not juge nefarious, just one I disagree with. That said, I've gone back reread the mail and you're right, I probably jumped the gun a bit here. I did understood "migrate these features to secure-only" as disabling those features on non-HTTPS at mid/long term. I think HTTPS "all-the-thing" trend is not necessarily a good thing. It is not _always_ needed, it can had complexity, it has a cost a it leads to an over simplification of security in general. It is a trend that annoys me a bit and I sometimes overreact about it. Note that I distinguish HTTPS "all-the-thing" from HTTPS "when and where it is needed" for security concerns.