3 ms·

Move along. No discernible point made here, philosophical or otherwise.

• Mithaldu 12y ago
  There IS a nice ASCII bunny though.
• 001sky 12y ago
  Unfortunately, this comment sums it up well.
• fitzwatermellow 12y ago
  Since at least Book X of Plato's Republic no one has come up with a better definition of Art than "derivative mimetic representations" of ideal forms. But, is "digital art" any different? How will "interactivity", "virtuality", "ephemerality", "networks", "presence", "artificiality" and "trans-humanism" alter the traditional notion of a single author of a work attempting to achieve immortality? And does it truly matter? Or are we just prejudiced by the fact we have not yet seen digital Picasso's or Dali's? Perhaps the pace of technology has outstripped the ability of artists to be the vanguard? Maybe we should begin looking to the neuroscientists to find a diagnosis for the symptoms we call Art?
  • 001sky 12y ago
    We've seen amazing digital art already, but that doesn't make the submitted article any good.