3 ms·

Your claim is utter absurdity. I stated the absence of something, and you demand that I prove the absence of it? Grow up. My "approach" is to call out a bullsh

Your claim is utter absurdity. I stated the absence of something, and you demand that I prove the absence of it? Grow up. My "approach" is to call out a bullshit, partisan, zero content article. If you don't like it, well bully for you. And FWIW, I succeeded in short circuiting some bullshit, taking many well worth it downvotes in the process (from imbeciles who are growing in ranks), angry idiots desperate that they can't ply their partisan bickery.

ska 12y ago
No. You stated that the article lacked solid critiques, but failed to address even one of the critiques presented and show it's lack of solidity. You further claimed that "instead weighs to emotion" but provided no evidence of it. Stating such things as if they are self evident from the text is posturing, not argument. This sort of blather serves no useful purpose in discourse, and is rightly despised as a favored tool of the demagogue. I'm well beyond diminishing returns here, so I'm done with this.
dang 12y ago
Several of your comments have been breaking the Hacker News guidelines. Please follow them when commenting on this site. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html
- engendered 12y ago
  No, they haven't. That this site is increasingly veering into Reddit land (with the same sort of absurd dogpile moderation -- countless of my completely benign comments have been downvoted by imbeciles who need to "punish" me), and this is on you, dear Dang. Yuk, within minutes on some long forgotten post -- downvoted. Either you have some pathetic, psychotic users who literally follow me around, or you yourself put some comical downvote bot on me. Sad stuff. HN continues its descent to complete irrelevance. Oh no, it's the clever slowban. So tricky.

ska 12y ago

No. You stated that the article lacked solid critiques, but failed to address even one of the critiques presented and show it's lack of solidity. You further claimed that "instead weighs to emotion" but provided no evidence of it. Stating such things as if they are self evident from the text is posturing, not argument. This sort of blather serves no useful purpose in discourse, and is rightly despised as a favored tool of the demagogue. I'm well beyond diminishing returns here, so I'm done with this.

dang 12y ago

Several of your comments have been breaking the Hacker News guidelines. Please follow them when commenting on this site. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html

engendered 12y ago
No, they haven't. That this site is increasingly veering into Reddit land (with the same sort of absurd dogpile moderation -- countless of my completely benign comments have been downvoted by imbeciles who need to "punish" me), and this is on you, dear Dang. Yuk, within minutes on some long forgotten post -- downvoted. Either you have some pathetic, psychotic users who literally follow me around, or you yourself put some comical downvote bot on me. Sad stuff. HN continues its descent to complete irrelevance. Oh no, it's the clever slowban. So tricky.