11 ms·
That is why you would use a caching proxy like Varnish (or Squid) and/or a web-server cache module like mod_cache (Apache) for. Using either of the above, you'
by powertower 12y ago
That is why you would use a caching proxy like Varnish (or Squid) and/or a web-server cache module like mod_cache (Apache) for.
Using either of the above, you'd reduce the latency and increase the through-put of WP to the likes of hosting a simple HTML page on nginx.
The picture gets a bit more complicated with the back-end admin area, user logins, sessions, dynamic page parts, etc. And there are ways to either handle it or just bypass the caching layer for it, but for handling reader traffic, caching is the key regardless of which CMS you use.
- vlunkr 12y agoYes, but I think the point being made, (which I agree with), is that a huge amount of sites using WP, or another CMS, are updated rarely, and would be simpler, faster, and more secure if they were static sites instead. Also, there are a number of amazing static site generators out there.