3 ms·
Medical ethics are nonetheless fairly effective at what they set out to do - because you'll get kicked out of the profession if you do anything too grossly unet
by JoachimSchipper 12y ago
Medical ethics are nonetheless fairly effective at what they set out to do - because you'll get kicked out of the profession if you do anything too grossly unethical.
- webnrrd2k 12y agoI think ethical education is important, and is more of a first step rather than a complete solution. It's probably effective with most well-meaning professionals. But there are obvious conflicts... It's a problem when my health care conflicts with a doctor's profit motive. As an example, pharmaceutical sales is built around getting doctors to do borderline unethical behaviors like over-prescribing or prescribing ineffective medications. Not directly on-topic, I read this about an hour ago... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Swango http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Swango, an article about a doctor who was a mass murderer, and was eventually caught after killing something in the range of 30--60 people, and provides an interesting counter-point to the effectiveness of medical ethics. I admit that it's an edge case, the exception rather than the rule, but even ethics training and oversight isn't effective against a bad actor.