3 ms·
"Really? Where is the evidence for this "fact"." Okay. Now you aren't even admitting that there are regulations. Wow. Just Wow. "They are adopted as regula
by paulhauggis 12y ago
"Really? Where is the evidence for this "fact"."
Okay. Now you aren't even admitting that there are regulations. Wow. Just Wow.
"They are adopted as regulation (under the law, not as law) and will be published before they become effective, and may be changed (e.g., by legislative action) if the American people are sufficiently unhappy with them to compel their Congressional representatives to act."
Have fun with that. Like I said. I don't want to hear one person coming on HN complaining about worse conditions after these new laws are passed.
I'm going to say this now: I told you so.
- dragonwriter 12y ago> Now you aren't even admitting that there are regulations. No, I'm asking for support for your claim that there are 700 new regulations. That the as-yet unpublished order contains regulations is a different claim than that it contains 700 new regulations. > I don't want to hear one person coming on HN complaining about worse conditions after these new laws are passed. What new laws?
- paulhauggis 12y agoI'm tired of you playing semantics to try to win the argument. I would rather discuss this with someone that has some actual substance.