Yeah, there's so much wrong with this paper that it ceases to be wrong and just enters a realm of academic Dadaism. It's basically impossible to even formulate

Yeah, there's so much wrong with this paper that it ceases to be wrong and just enters a realm of academic Dadaism. It's basically impossible to even formulate a working hypothesis without having a deep understanding of the socioeconomic drivers and effects around educational attainment and post-graduate alienation. The idea that engineers are inherently radicalizable runs counter to the academic thinking on the subject -- the article is provocative, sure, but extraordinary claims &c....