5 ms·
What most people don't realize about VC is that: First, there are two VC industries. There is the one that funds biotech and clean-tech and there is the bubble
by michaelochurch 12y ago
What most people don't realize about VC is that:
First, there are two VC industries. There is the one that funds biotech and clean-tech and there is the bubble-centric consumer web one that gets all the press here. The first exists to fill a gap (R&D projects that the mainstream private sector is too cowardly to try) and isn't sexy because the upfront capital costs are very high, meaning VCs take a lot of the money, meaning that founders becoming billionaires is next to impossible. But on the whole, the VCs in that sector are actually pretty ethical. Obviously, they're in the game to make money, but they're trying to make it the honest way: by capitalizing good businesses. The second, sleazier VC industry-- the one with the slimy co-funding/back-channeling culture that funds a lot of stupid ideas and frat boys-- is the one that gets all the press here.
As for that sector of VC, they're in the business of taking strategies that are profitable but illegal in public markets (e.g. market manipulation, insider trading) and applying them to private stocks that are less well-regulated. They encourage (and, sometimes, demand) extreme risk taking because they don't really care which businesses go up and down, they just want volatility (for it's own sake) in the market, never mind if this leads to bad decisions and damages the careers of people they view as peasants.
The slimy consumer-web build-to-flip VC will also never leave California. Why? Because a lot of the note-sharing that VCs engage in is illegal and simply can't be done except in-person, because it would be too devastating if the phone logs or emails ever surfaced in discovery. For one of many examples, they make a lot of back-channel reference calls in deciding whether to fund someone, and it's a well-known fact of HR that the main (if not the only) reason to make a back-channel reference call is to violate EEOC provisions.
- simonebrunozzi 12y agoMichael, interesting point of view. It seems that you are well versed into these things. What's your specific experience, and would you mind sharing some specific stories (without naming names)?
- flinty 12y agoDidn't see the username and while reading the comment a thought came to mind - this seems like something Michael Church might have written. Looked up and it was indeed Michael Church
- bkeroack 12y agoI agree with the extreme risk-taking part 100%. VCs (and that's a bit of a misnomer, since real Venture Capital funds typically don't get involved until the $100MM level or so) don't care about your business in particular, they depend upon a ~10% hit rate in their portfolio of at least 10X returns. That means they will push the executive team to take huge risks for the tiny chance of becoming a billion dollar unicorn, possibly destroying any chance of the business surviving at a more modest level. They don't want $10 million/year businesses and would rather see them go under ("aqui-fail") and move on to the next thing.